
Andrew Binstock is the principal analyst at Pacific Data Works. He writes regularly about IT at GreenerComputing.com. Andrew is also a columnist for SDTimes and a senior contributing editor for InfoWorld, where he analyzes market trends and performs review of enterprise development products.
Previously, he was a senior manager at PriceWaterhouseCoopers, where he oversaw technology forecasting for the firm's clients. Prior to that, he was editor in chief of UNIX Review, and earlier of the C Gazette. He started his career in technology in 1981 as a software developer. He has written several books on programming, published by Addison-Wesley and Intel Press. For the last 17 years, he has been a judge for the Jolt awards.
In June and August of last year, I wrote a pair of columns in which I extolled the value of virtualization as a solution to excessive energy consumption. The primary benefit, as I described it, is that virtualization makes it possible to consolidate multiple applications onto a single server. That is, apps that currently run on dedicated systems can be moved en masse to a single server that consumes less power -- generally, far less power -- than that required by the dedicated servers.
This economy derives from two principal factors:
1) Modern servers are much more energy-efficient than their forbears. This is true in absolute terms and relative terms. In fact, in relative terms, such as watts per mips, today's systems are orders of magnitude more efficient.
2)
Until very recently, the need for IT to really include eco-concerns as part of overall strategy did not have universal appeal. Surely, sites located in areas such as southern Manhattan where power distribution is already running at maximum capacity have a grave problem. And likewise sites that need more room but have tight expansion constraints. For them, green has been a key preoccupation for a while.
For most other IT sites, however, the main driver for green has been cost reduction -- and until the last few months, the cost of energy was tolerable even if somewhat higher than budgeted. So, pressure existed to reduce unnecessary consumption, but not place the issue at the center of IT concerns. However, with oil now regularly surpassing $130 per barrel, there is no longer any
See ClimateBiz.com
See GreenBiz.com